Among the few reliably known facts biography of William SHaksper is one worthy of reflection, but past him with ease are those who believe in the insignificance of his personality. This sudden break-up of the fate of three decades of a man who grew up in a provincial city, was married to the benefit of women is considerably older than him, birthed his children and then suddenly left the familiar world and then went to London to become a comedian. He joined the people, regarded as vagrants, not even had permanent premises, where they could ply their trade (the first theater in London was built long after, as SHaksper became an actor). Benefits guaranteed by the same social status, he was traded to the fickleness of fortune, did not accept the vagabond hypocrite, which is permanently expelled from the business part of London’s Lord Mayor.
And in this new environment for them, he succeeded. Playing on, the scene facelifts old plays and doing their own (?), He managed to stand out among the other actors-professionals to become a shareholder in the company, put together a sufficient condition to the end of life buy himself a knighthood. We know nothing about his real life in London, but the environment in which he moved, is well known: it was a world of actors and their aristocratic patrons, the royal court, where they are frequently staged plays, and could see the queen, at home to know where the writers invited to order them a script for live pictures or amateur plays masks. It was valued originality, and Shakespeare of Stratford is not lost in the whirlwind of city life. He somehow was seen Count Southampton and may have before them a young, brilliant aristocrat Earl of Essex and Retlend. It SHaksper, and anyone else interested in the latter (even if we assume that Retlend chose it only to participate in its ambitious literary hoaxes). This alone does not allow to speak about his mediocrity.
Another turning point in the fate of Shakespeare and receives no interpretation – just as a sudden break with the theatrical world and return to Stratford. Even if we assume that he was not a creator of brilliant plays, it is unclear why a successful businessman, as he sees non-stratford not stayed in the capital, where so successfully carried on business? What made him come back? His sense of duty towards his family, which was alien to him and had been abandoned for many years? Illness, fatigue life? Philosophical state of mind at the end of life and the conscious direction of her in a new direction? We do not know the answers, but this does not mean that you can ignore the issues and easily refuse the man in the depths of spiritual experiences only on the basis that we know very little about them.